If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user


BOMBARDIER Regional Jet CRJ-1000

From SKYbrary Wiki

Name Regional Jet CRJ-1000
Manufacturer BOMBARDIER
Body Narrow
Wing Fixed Wing
Position Low wing (winglets)
Tail T-tail
WTC Medium
Type code L2J
Engine Jet
Engine count Multi
Position Both sides of rear fuselage
Landing gear Tricycle retractable
Mass group 4

Manufacturered as:

BOMBARDIER Regional Jet CRJ-1000
BOMBARDIER CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-1000
BOMBARDIER CL-600-2E25 Regional Jet CRJ-1000

BOMBARDIER Regional Jet CRJ-1000

BOMBARDIER Regional Jet CRJ-1000 BOMBARDIER Regional Jet CRJ-1000 3D


Regional airliner. First delivery in 2011. New stretched and more powerfull development of CRJ-900 for up to 100 passengers. First flight in 2009. Canadair is now part of the Bombardier Group. The CRJX is a member of the CRJ family.

Technical Data

Wing span 26.2 m85.958 ft <br />
Length 39.1 m128.281 ft <br />
Height 7.5 m24.606 ft <br />
Powerplant 2 x 64.5 KN GE CF34-8C5A1 turbofans
Engine model General Electric CF34

Performance Data

Take-Off Initial Climb
(to 5000 ft)
Initial Climb
(to FL150)
Initial Climb
(to FL240)
MACH Climb Cruise Initial Descent
(to FL240)
(to FL100)
Descent (FL100
& below)
V2 (IAS) kts IAS 300 kts IAS 350 kts IAS 420 kts MACH TAS 470 kts MACH IAS kts IAS kts Vapp (IAS) kts
Distance 2120 m ROC ft/min ROC ft/min ROC ft/min ROC ft/min MACH 0.82 ROD ft/min ROD ft/min MCS kts Distance 1750 m
MTOW 3900039,000 kg <br />39 tonnes <br /> kg Ceiling FL410 ROD ft/min APC
WTC M Range 15001,500 nm <br />2,778,000 m <br />2,778 km <br />9,114,173.235 ft <br /> NM

Accidents & Serious Incidents involving CRJX

  • A320 (2) / CRJX (2) / B738 (3) / A332, vicinity Madrid Barajas Spain, 2018 (On 27 May 2018, four losses of separation on final approach during use of dependent parallel landing runways occurred within 30 minutes at Madrid following a non-scheduled weather-induced runway configuration change. This continuing situation was then resolved by reverting to a single landing runway. The Investigation attributed these events to “the complex operational situation” which had prevailed following a delayed decision to change runway configuration after seven consecutive go-arounds in 10 minutes using the previous standard runway configuration. The absence of sufficient present weather information for the wider Madrid area to adequately inform ATC tactical strategy was assessed as contributory.)
  • CRJX / AT75, Tambolaka Indonesia, 2018 (On 11 May 2018, a Bombardier CRJ1000 climbing on departure from Tambolaka and an ATR72-500 descending inbound there lost safe separation when during opposite turns in visual flight in uncontrolled airspace. Prompt response to both coordinated TCAS RAs resolved the conflict. The Investigation found the departing flight Captain mixed up left and right downwind circuit joining by the ATR 72 and that his inexperienced First Officer had not picked this up. It also noted that this Captain may not have been fit for duty and that all parties may have failed to fully recognise the limitations of ANSP ‘information’ service.)
  • CRJX, Madrid Spain, 2015 (On 1 February 2015, a Bombardier CRJ 1000 departed from Pamplona with slush likely to have been in excess of the regulatory maximum depth on the runway. On landing at Madrid, the normal operation of the brake units was compromised by ice and one tyre burst damaging surrounding components and leaving debris on the runway, and the other tyre was slow to spin up and sustained a serious flat spot. The Investigation concluded that the Pamplona apron, taxiway and runway had not been properly cleared of frozen deposits and that the flight crew had not followed procedures appropriate for the prevailing conditions.)