If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user


Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)

From SKYbrary Wiki

Revision as of 10:52, 31 December 2009 by Timo.Kouwenhoven (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Article Information
Category: Controlled Flight Into Terrain Controlled Flight Into Terrain
Content source: SKYbrary About SKYbrary

Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)


Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) occurs when an airworthy aircraft under the complete control of the pilot is inadvertently flown into terrain, water, or an obstacle. The pilots are generally unaware of the danger until it is too late.

Most CFIT accidents occur in the approach and landing phase of flight and are often associated with non-precision approaches.

Many CFIT accidents occur because of loss of situational awareness, particularly in the vertical plane, and many crash sites are on the centreline of an approach to an airfield. Lack of familiarity with the approach or misreading of the approach plate are common causal factors, particularly where the approach features steps down in altitude from the initial approach fix to the final approach fix.


  • Collision with the ground resulting in Hull Loss and fatalities/injuries.


Typical Scenarios

  • Pilot-induced situation: The pilot encountered weather conditions that were worse than forecast and, in an attempt to maintain or regain visual contact with the ground in an area of very low cloud, descended below Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) and the aircraft struck the ground. Contributing to this accident was the pilot's over-reliance on Global Positioning System (GPS) while attempting to maintain Visual Meteorological Conditions (Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC)) and a resultant lack of adequate situational awareness of terrain.
  • ATCO-induced situation: The controller gave an aircraft which was still at 210 KIAS an intermediate heading towards the Instrument Landing System (ILS) centreline during a radar vectored initial approach but was subsequently distracted and failed to issue the intercept heading for the ILS LLZ. When the flight crew, who were unfamiliar with the approach, failed to notice the situation in time to query it, the aircraft flew beyond the centreline and into high terrain on the other side before resolution was possible.

Contributory Factors

  • Weather: Rain, turbulence, and icing, may increase the workload of the pilot and cause interference reducing the accuracy of radio navigation beacons. Poor visibility, particularly at night can contribute to disorientation and loss of situational awareness.
  • Approach Design and documentation: The depiction of an approach, and particularly step down fixes, on Terminal Approach Procedure (TAP) plates may not be clear. Approaches may take aircraft close to high terrain in order to comply with diplomatic or noise abatement constraints, or to deconflict with departure routes.
  • Pilot Fatigue and Disorientation. Approach and landing is a demanding phase of flight for pilots.


Related Articles

Further Reading

The Flight Safety Foundation ALAR Toolkit The Flight Safety Foundation has been at the forefront of efforts to reduce CFIT accidents. The Flight Safety Foundation ALAR Toolkit provides useful training information and guides to best practice. Copies of the FSF ALAR Toolkit may be ordered from the Flight Safety Foundation ALAR web-site http://www.flightsafety.org/current-safety-initiatives/approach-and-landing-accident-reduction-alar

HindSight Articles:


Airbus Safety Library

Boeing AERO magazine

Return to CFIT Category Index